Family/Midscale Restaurants - US

  • Go Back
  • Text Size:
  • Family/Midscale Restaurants - US

    Mintel International Group Ltd.
    11/1/2009
    113 Pages

    Abstract:

    Given family restaurants’ success with the breakfast menu and the importance of coffee, it virtually necessitates these operators jump on the bandwagon in the gourmet coffee trend.

    Taking a cue from McDonald’s McCafé, a similar effort could help family restaurants strengthen their appeal to key demographics—women, under-35s and higher-income households, and could help build to-go business.


    Table of Contents:

    SCOPE AND THEMES
    What you need to know
    Definition
    Data sources
    Sales data
    Mintel Menu Insights
    Consumer survey data
    Advertising creative
    Abbreviations and terms
    Abbreviations
    Terms


    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    The challenge of a recession
    Declining same-store sales signals trouble with guest traffic
    It’s a “diner’s market”—value prices result from excess supply of restaurant choices
    Influential demographics—age and race/Hispanic origin
    Family restaurant analysis
    IHOP
    Denny’s
    Cracker Barrel
    Golden Corral
    Bob Evans Farms
    Menu focus: IHOP
    Advertising and promotion activity
    Menu innovation—comfort and breakfast
    Health on the menu—a long way to go
    The family restaurant consumer
    Where consumers go to eat
    Which family restaurants consumers go to
    Family restaurants and the ethnic consumer
    Family restaurants and “the family”
    What influences diners to choose family restaurants
    Reasons that drive choice of restaurants
    When, where and how consumers eat at restaurants


    MARKET SIZE AND FORECAST
    Key points
    Declining same-store sales trends signal guest traffic troubles
    Figure 1: Selected family restaurant chains same-store sales growth trends, 2005-09
    Family restaurants feeling pressure as diners trade down/out
    The future of family restaurants
    Figure 2: Total U.S. systemwide sales of leading family restaurants, at current prices, 2005-13
    Figure 3: Total U.S. systemwide sales of leading family restaurants, at inflation-adjusted prices, 2005-13


    COMPETITIVE CONTEXT
    It’s a diner’s market
    Casual restaurants: Discounting galore and “all you can eat” specials
    QSR: Actively courting the breakfast consumer
    Pizza: A convenient family pleaser
    Fighting over the kids


    MARKET DRIVERS
    Restaurant industry recession continues, but the bottom may be in sight
    Figure 4: Restaurant Performance Index, current situation, and expectations, May 2007-July 2009
    Consumer confidence undermines willingness to spend at restaurants
    Figure 5: Consumer Sentiment Index, by quarter, 2001-09
    Figure 6: Family restaurant spend compared to last year, by age, household income and race/Hispanic origin, July 2009
    Baby Boomers key consumers; Millennials offer growth potential
    Figure 7: Usage of family restaurant, top restaurants, by age, February 2008-March 2009
    Figure 8: Population aged 18 or older, 2004-14
    Usage among the fastest-growing ethnic groups lags
    Figure 9: Usage of family restaurant, top restaurants, by race/Hispanic origin, February 2008-March 2009
    Figure 10: Population, by race and Hispanic origin, 2004-14


    LEADING COMPANIES
    Key points
    Leading family restaurant chains weather the recessionary storm
    Figure 11: U.S. systemwide sales of leading family restaurant chains, 2006-08
    Unit growth declining incrementally
    Figure 12: U.S. systemwide units for leading family restaurant chains, 2006-08


    RESTAURANT ANALYSIS: IHOP
    Key points
    Growth trends
    Figure 13: Change in IHOP systemwide same-store sales, 2005-08
    Keeping the brand fresh and energized
    Value-oriented, limited-time offers
    Marketing and promotion drive brand awareness
    Demographic connections
    Attracting higher-income consumers through customizable options
    Maximizing appeal for parents of little ones
    Ethnic opportunities
    Figure 14: Eat at IHOP, by age, race/Hispanic origin and household income, February 2008-March 2009


    RESTAURANT ANALYSIS: DENNY’S
    Key points
    Growth trends
    Figure 15: Change in Denny’s same-store sales, 2005-08
    Seeking improvements in 2009 through value and innovation
    Value—free food incentive to drive guest traffic
    Menu innovation—diversity plus a new burger focus
    Health initiatives—innovation on the kids’ menu
    Courting key demographics
    Making the late-night connection with its young diners
    Hispanics
    Figure 16: Eat at Denny’s, by age and race/Hispanic origin, February 2008-March 2009


    RESTAURANT ANALYSIS: CRACKER BARREL
    Key points
    Growth trends
    Figure 17: Change in Cracker Barrel systemwide same-store sales, 2005-09
    A differentiated concept
    The front porch environment
    The retail shop
    Successful at lunch and dinner—driving average check higher
    Figure 18: Cracker Barrel, share of sales by daypart, 2009
    Source: Mintel/Cracker Barrel
    Streamlining traditional menu
    The Cracker Barrel customer
    Figure 19: Eat at Cracker Barrel, by age, region, race/Hispanic origin and presence of children, February 2008-March 2009


    RESTAURANT ANALYSIS: GOLDEN CORRAL
    Key points
    Growth trends
    The buffet advantage
    New prototype
    An abundance of choices for all
    Potential to expand ethnic reach
    Figure 20: Eat at Golden Corral, by race/Hispanic origin, February 2008-March 2009


    RESTAURANT ANALYSIS: BOB EVANS FARMS
    Key points
    Growth trends
    Figure 21: Change in Bob Evans annual prices and systemwide same-store sales, 2005-09
    Regional brand with national presence
    Home-style menu
    Figure 22: Bob Evans Farms, share of sales, by daypart and average check, 2009
    Source: Mintel/Bob Evans
    Strong regional influence; little ethnic appeal
    Figure 23: Eat at Bob Evans, by region and race/Hispanic origin, February 2008-March 2009


    MENU ANALYSIS: IHOP
    Overview
    Menu favorites: Breakfast items are the clear winner
    Men look for heartier fare
    Figure 24: IHOP menu ordering on last visit, by gender, July 2009
    Young diners look beyond the traditional breakfast menu when ordering
    Figure 25: IHOP menu ordering on last visit, by age, July 2009


    ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION
    Overview
    Figure 26: Top family restaurant chain advertisers, 2007 and 2008
    Targeting competition with a $5 price point
    Sizzler’s strategy: Limited value menu
    Figure 27: Sizzler, 5 for $5, March 2009
    Bob Evans’ strategy: Value portions
    Figure 28: Bob Evans, Deep Dish Pastas, September 2009
    Shoney’s strategy: Abundance
    Figure 29: Shoney’s, Small Amounts of Food, September 2009
    Strategy: Value menu
    Justifying a higher price point
    Strategy: Entice customers who equate value with quantity and choice
    Figure 30: Golden Corral, Amusement Park of Food, September 2009
    Figure 31: Ponderosa, Freedom by the Plateful, July 2009
    Figure 32: Friendly’s, Flip chart presentation, September 2009


    INNOVATIONS AND INNOVATORS


    MENU INNOVATION
    Key points
    Comfort foods top innovation
    Homemade equals familiarity
    Country style equals southern comfort
    Figure 33: Top family restaurant menu items, by marketing claim, Q3 2007-Q3 2009
    Breakfast innovation
    Figure 34: Family restaurant usage, by daypart, July 2009
    Figure 35: Top family restaurant menu items, by menu item dish, Q3 2007-Q3 2009


    HEALTH ON THE MENU
    Key points
    Health: Consumers’ perceptions
    Figure 36: Consumer diet self-perceptions, degree of healthfulness, July 2009
    Figure 37: Importance of eating healthy, degree of importance, July 2009
    Defining health
    Nutritional menu items lacking
    Figure 38: Top family restaurant menu items, by nutritional claim, Q3 2007-Q3 2009
    Eliminating the veto factor


    RESTAURANT USAGE OVERVIEW
    Key points
    Restaurant usage
    Figure 39: Restaurant usage in last year, by selected demographics, July 2009
    Restaurant usage, by segment
    Demographic analysis
    Figure 40: Usage of restaurant segments in past three months, by gender, July 2009
    Figure 41: Usage of restaurant segments in past three months, by age, July 2009
    Figure 42: Usage of restaurant segments in past three months, by household income, July 2009
    Figure 43: Usage of restaurant segments in past three months, by presence of children in household, July 2009
    Consumer question explanation


    FAMILY RESTAURANT USAGE
    Key points
    2000-08 usage trends
    Figure 44: Usage of “top 6” family restaurants, 1999/2000-2007/08
    Family restaurant usage
    Figure 45: Usage of leading family restaurant chains, by restaurant, July 2009
    Demographic analysis
    Figure 46: Usage of leading family restaurant chains, by restaurant, by gender, July 2009
    Figure 47: Usage of leading family restaurant chains, by restaurant, by age, July 2009
    Figure 48: Usage of leading family restaurant chains, by restaurant, by presence of children, July 2009


    FAMILY RESTAURANT USAGE—IMPACT OF RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN
    Key points
    Family restaurant usage by race/Hispanic origin
    Figure 49: Top family restaurant usage, by restaurant, by race/Hispanic origin, October 2007-December 2008
    Acculturated versus non-acculturated Hispanics
    Figure 50: Top family restaurant Hispanic usage, by restaurant, by degree of English spoken in home, October 2007-December 2008


    FAMILY RESTAURANT USAGE AND KIDS
    Key points
    Parents take kids to family restaurants
    Figure 51: Likelihood of children going with parents to pizza, family and casual restaurants, July 2009
    Figure 52: Likelihood of children going with parents to family restaurants, by selected demographics, July 2009


    FAMILY RESTAURANT DECISION INFLUENCERS
    Key points
    Competitive analysis: Pizza, family, and casual restaurants
    Figure 53: Pizza, family, and casual restaurant decision influencers, July 2009
    Demographic analysis: Influencing factors for choosing family restaurants
    Figure 54: Family restaurant influencers, by gender, July 2009
    Figure 55: Family restaurant influencers, by age, July 2009


    FAMILY RESTAURANTS: REASONS CONSUMERS CHOOSE THEM
    Key points
    Competitive analysis: Pizza, family and casual restaurants
    Figure 56: Reasons to eat out at pizza, family and casual restaurants, July 2009
    Demographic analysis: Reasons consumers eat out at family restaurants
    Figure 57: Reasons to eat out at family restaurants, by gender, July 2009
    Figure 58: Reasons to eat out at family restaurants, by age, July 2009


    FAMILY RESTAURANTS: USAGE BY DAYPART
    Key points
    Breakfast differentiates family restaurants
    Figure 59: Restaurant mealtimes, daypart, by segment, July 2009
    Figure 60: Family restaurant mealtimes, daypart, by gender, July 2009
    Figure 61: Family restaurant mealtimes, daypart, by age, July 2009


    FAMILY RESTAURANT USAGE BY PROCUREMENT METHOD
    Key points
    Competitive analysis: Pizza, family, and casual restaurants
    Figure 62: Pizza, family and casual restaurant delivery, pickup and dine-in purchases, July 2009
    Demographic analysis: Procurement method at family restaurants
    Figure 63: Family restaurant delivery, pickup and dine-in purchases, by age, July 2009


    APPENDIX: ADDITIONAL CONSUMER TABLES—INCOME
    Figure 64: Usage of leading family restaurant chains, by restaurant, by household income, July 2009
    Figure 65: Reasons consumers eat out at family restaurants, by household income, July 2009
    Figure 66: Family restaurant delivery, pickup and dine-in purchases, by household income, July 2009
    Figure 67: Family restaurant mealtimes, by household income, July 2009


    APPENDIX: TRADE ASSOCIATIONS

  • Go Back
  • Text Size:
  • Report information is provided by MarketResearch.com
    Ads by Nevistas

    Newsletters
    Hospitality
    Trends
     
    Hospitality
    Newsletter
     
    Hospitality
    Technology
     
    Your Email Address
     
    Advertise Here